|
Issue 26
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
BOOK OF THE MONTH ::
AND THE FLOWERS SHOWERED
I’M
INTRIGUED AND DELIGHTED TO be writing this introduction,
no doubt about it. All the same, I ask myself, what
for? For whom is it intended? Why insert, between
Osho and you his reader, the reflections of a third
party called Douglas Harding? Or of any other go-between,
for that matter?
I’m
not at all sure about the answer to these questions.
What I can say with full assurance, however is that
I have found this book fascinating. There’s
so much in it that I want to underscore heavily. Mind
you, I am not saying that Osho’s way is exactly
my way. Or that it s or should be exactly yours. But
I would like to think that my responses to it will
help you to clarify and deepen yours. After all, the
essential thing is that we should discover what’s
true and precious in our very own experience. Here,
each of us must, as the Buddha taught, be a lamp unto
himself, and his own authority on what its like to
be and not to be. Nowhere in all the world is there
any substitute for direct, first hand experience of
the experiencer. Namely, oneself.
This
true self reliance is what Osho urges upon us all.
Let us no longer be cowards, he says, and supinely
take on the reach-me-down answers of a Buddha or a
Jesus or of any other master. In the last resort we
can only find the saving truth within, at our own
deepest level. Though this ever- luminous truth, once
uncovered, is seen to be one and the same in all beings,
there are countless routes to it, one per traveler.
The only way from you to you – to the spot you
never really left-is your way. So stop thrashing around,
and dare to become the specialist on what’s
given right where you are, in the place where only
you are present and correct- and extremely special-
an no one else can get a look in. “The difference
between you and a Buddha is not a difference of character
– remember this: it is not a difference of morality,
it is not a difference in virtue and non virtue. It
is a difference in where you are grounded….
A Buddha is grounded in the center.” So to be
a Buddha, try being in to lunch with yourself, instead
of out to lunch (as they say), with all and sundry.
Bon Appetit!
And
what, in brief, does this home ground amount to, this
ultimate goal and Meaning and Resource, the Beneficence,
this True Nature of yours at center? It has two contrasting
aspects. First, it’s the Aware Emptiness which
is more intimately you than anything you can name.
Unlike Osho I call this the Immanent God. Second,
it’s the Aware Fullness that rushes in (if only
you will let it) to fill the vacuum: the ultimate
wonder- self originating, limitless, timeless- the
power and the glory that’s absolutely other
than you. Unlike Osho again, I call this the Transcendent
God. But we are agreed that to pick on one side of
this coin of infinite value, and never turn it over,
is to remain a pauper.
How
precisely, to find and cash in on this two-sided treasure
of treasures- call it what you like? The answer is
simplicity itself: By attending to what’s given
right now, right where you are. Not to what’s
known or believed in or remembered, not to what’s
anticipated or hoped for, but to what’s on show
here at this time. What’s clearly presented.
“Being true to the moment is Buddhahood,”
says Osho. The reason we are not our authentic self,
which is only now, is that we keep dragging into its
irrelevancies that don’t belong here. And using
the to cover up God’s marvelous birthday present
to us. Birthday present.
What
sort of life is it, consciously to live from our center
which is this marvelous gift of God? It is to see
what we see instead of what we are told to see. It
is to be wide awake, no longer in a coma. It is to
live a life of childlike spontaneity, letting each
unique occasion elicit that unique and unpredictable
response which is tailor made for that occasion. Above
all, its to live a life of trust. Who we really, really
are can be counted on to come up with what we really
need. Not (I stress) with what we want, but with what’s
necessary. Which amounts to saying that this ultimate
resource isn’t for exploiting. “The greatest
cannot be used”. On the contrary we are used
by it. I wish I could sound this warning in fluorescent
trumpet-tones.
So
much for the general shape of the true spiritual life,
as set out in detail with humor and charm, in Osho’s
distinctive style.
One
big question remains. The practical question of how,
exactly, to come to and live from one’s Emptiness-Fullness,
one’s Selfness-Otherness, one’s centrality?
I am not thinking of the occasional flash of lightning
at night, but rather of the steady shining of the
midday sun. Of Awareness aware of itself without interruption.
There
are, as we have already noticed, countless ways back
to the Spot where its always high noon. For us here
they converge to become just three:
1. The first is spontaneous Home Coming. Ramana Maharishi
and Ananda Mayi Ma – eminent sages who never
had a guru or master – spring to mind. Needless
to say, such spiritual geniuses are very rare indeed.
2. The second is initiation by a master or guru. This
is the normal Hindu procedure, with parallels in other
religions. It’s the one described and prescribed
by Osho. Here we have a combination of disciplines
(physical, mental, spiritual), of darshan (which is
the effect on the disciple of staying in the presence
of the master), and the thrust (subtle, energetic
or violent) administered by the master when he judges
the disciple to be ready for pushing over the brink.
Nisargadatta Maharaj, for instance, was a master who
had himself been initiated by a master, whom he never
tired of gratefully acknowledging.
It must be said, however that the number of disciples
who are thus pushed or pulled from outer darkness
into the full light of home- who not only “get”
it but do so with enough conviction to announce to
the world that they have indeed “got”
it- is small. For example, not more than a handful
of Ramana’s very numerous disciples claimed
to have arrived at anything like spiritual independence.
3. I call the third route The Rediscovery of the Obvious.
This way was opened out in China during the T’ang
and Sung dynasties by Hui-meng and his successors.
For them, the essential breakthrough was (in effect)
to turn one’s attention round 180’ and
look in at what one’s looking out of. This amounted
to observing the total contrast between one’s
acquired and very human face over there in the mirror,
and one’s original and non-human No-face right
here at no distance at all. Ch’an masters Huang-po
and Hui-hai insisted ( as millennium later, Ramana
insisted) that this seeing through to one’s
central and featureless Immensity is the most natural,
available, obvious thing imaginable. And, alas, just
about the most feared and resisted.
The
past thousand years of spiritual adventure have seen
sporadic revivals of this most direct of realizations.
The great Sufi Jelaluddin Rumi, for example, frequently
urges us to behead ourselves: we are to become seeing,
seeing, seeing. And Osho himself, in his Orange book,
speaks highly of “headlessness”, recommending
with detailed instructions what he calls “The
Guillotine meditation”.
Also
in the west there has been developing, over the past
half century, a movement known as “the headless
way”, which deploys a variety of techniques
for drawing our ( normally unwilling) attention to
what’s given at the center of our world. To
wit, not two tiny, shuttered spy holes in an eight
inch meatball, but one immense, frameless, glassless
“window” with nobody peeking out of it.
Let
me hasten to add, that, of the large numbers who lose
their heads briefly, few go on losing them till they
stay lost forever. Nevertheless decapitation is never
fruitless. Given rain after years of total drought,
encysted seeds in the Australian outback shoot up
almost overnight into gorgeous flowers. Even so, given
grace, encysted God-seeds may be counted on to blossom
into God – in his own good time. All of them.
There are no dud God seeds.
Such,
in barest outline, are our three ways home –
the spontaneous way, the initiation by guru way, and
the obvious or Headless way. Osho’s roadmap,
as I read it, has room for all three.
The
joke to end all jokes is that in fact you never for
a moment strayed an inch from the peace and safety
of home. The way in is seeing you never left.
Look
now at what’s given your side of these printed
words, at the place they are being viewed from. Though
you search the cosmos for an age of ages, you will
never find a ROOM as roomy as this, as deep, as high
and wide and handsome.
Hush!
It’s the Throne Room of His Majesty, the king
of all kings.
D.H. Harding
|
|