Osho World Online Magazine :: October 2010 - Osho_Responsibility
Untitled Document
Main Story
    Love and Responsibility

    Duty or Responsibility
In Focus

The blame game and slave mentality
By Anand Bhagawati

By Swami Satya Vedant

The Ability to Respond
By Ma Prem Gitamo

Response Here and Now
By Lakshen Sucameli

The Four Letter Words: Duty, Work and Love
By Swami Chaitanya Keerti

Story of the Month
Special Feature
    By Sarjano
Care for the earth
    Cosmic Chemistry

    Solar Storm

    News Update

    Steps you can...

From the World of Sannyas
    Sannyas Roundup By Ma Anand Bhagawati
Sannyas News
    The Last Resort...

    Osho Upaban, Pokhara, Nepal

    Mike Edwards dies in Accident

    And finally...
book serialization

    From Lemurs to Lamas
    Clay with a Soul

    Krishna Week celebrations
    Sit still, breathe!

    The real self and the false ego

    Media in Hindi
    Techniques to...
Book Intro
    Zen: The Quantum Leap From Mind To No-Mind
    Laugh Your Way to God
    Tantra by Mahasatvaa Ma Ananda Sarita
    Message from the Master

Book Serialization

To celebrate two new titles “Bhagawad Geeta” and “From Lemurs to Lamas”, we are running short serializations of both the titles in this issue. The serializations will continue over the next months in every issue of the magazine. Happy reading...


Translated by Swami Satya Vedant

Discourses given by Osho at Cross Maidan, Bombay
28th December, 1970 - 7th January 1971

Question: Beloved Osho, if an extrovert person were to go on becoming an introvert in his spiritual journey, should he change his path as he moves further on?   

OSHO: No, it doesn’t happen that way. As the extrovert person moves on, he becomes one with the whole universe. As he advances, he reaches to a point beyond which nothing is left outside, he becomes identified with the outer world. The day this happens, nothing remains within or without. But by becoming one with the world outside, he finds himself and he finds the truth. Then he declares: ‘I am Brahman’. He becomes one with the entire universe. When he says: ‘I am the Whole’, he is indeed one with the Whole. Then he feels the moon and the stars are moving inside him. The introvert person while going deep within comes to a point where nothing is left to be seen, he becomes a void. Then he is able to say: ‘I am not’. Such as the flame of a lamp blows out and disappears -- everything disappears.

The extrovert is ultimately able to grasp the whole. The introvert is ultimately able to grasp the shunya, the void. And both, the void and the purna, the whole, mean the same thing. But the extrovert reaches by moving along the outer journey; the introvert reaches by moving along the inner journey.  At the end, the extrovert completely eliminates the inner world, nothing is left inside, only the outer world remains. The introvert goes on becoming oblivious of the outer world to such a point that nothing remains outside.

And the interesting thing is that both the inner and the outer prevail together. Of the two only one cannot remain. Hence, when one disappears the other disappears too. If only the outer were to exist and nothing remains inwardly, the outer too will be no more. Because how would you otherwise identify the outer?  In order for the outer to exist, the inner is necessary. It is only because there is the inner does the outer exist. If only the inner were to be left and nothing were to remain in the outer at all, how would you be able to call it the inner?  It exists only in comparison to something of the outer, it is inner relative to the outer.

For example, the pocket of your jacket -- its one part makes the inner side in which you put your hand, and the other is the visible part seen outside. Can you ever imagine a situation where only the inside of the pocket would remain without its outer part?

Or, take your home, for example, Can you ever think that only the inner section of the house should remain and not what is outside of it? If only the interior part were to exist but not the outer part, the inner too will cease to be. If only what is outside were to remain and nothing inside, that which is outside the house would also cease to exist. The inner and the outer are two sides of the same coin.

Hence, there are two ways to go about. Either drop the outer or drop the inner. With the falling of one, the other will also fall on its own accord. And then, that which would remain, which was present in the outer as well as in the inner -- in fact, it was always present even beyond the inner and the outer too. If our journey has been outward, then, that which would remain to exist we will call it the Brahman; if we have followed the inward journey, we will call it shunya, void, nirvana.

Those who have seen god as Whole, they have traveled through the outer journey. Those who have seen god as a Void, they have followed the inner journey. It is not that while following the spiritual discipline of yoga, or the outer path, some day you will have to start with the Sankhya -- there is no need for it. Yoga itself will help you to reach.

Let us look at it yet another way so that it becomes easier to understand. Let us assume a man is standing at the number ten and if he were to proceed from ten to number eleven and then twelve and so on, he would eventually reach to the infinite. A point will come where all numbers would vanish. If he were to come down from number ten to nine, eight, and thus move back, after reaching number one he would arrive at zero where all numbers are bound to disappear too. No matter from which end you begin your journey, the numbers will disappear. When this happens then it does not matter from where you started your search. That which will remain beyond the numbers will be the same. This can be understood in terms of Positive and Negative as well.

Some people like positive words; these are the same people who are extrovert. Some people like negative words; these are the people who are introvert -- such as, the Buddha. Buddha is very fond of negative terms. Even if God were to appear before him, He would appear in terms of “nothingness”, in terms of void. Hence the word Buddha chose for his
moksha, for his liberation is -- nirvana. And nirvana means: blowing of the lamp. Such as a lamp blows out, similarly, the individual blows out. What remains after that, is nirvana.

Someone asks Buddha, “ What will happen to you after nirvana?” And Buddha says: “What happens when the lamp blows out? It becomes one with the Void”. So Buddha’s emphasis is on the negative. It is an introvert’s emphasis. Whenever an introvert will speak he will use negative terms. He will say: “neti, neti”, neither this, nor that. One wants to reach a point where nothing is left. But when nothing is left, everything is found. Then there is language of the positive: this, and this, and this too. When everything comes together, then what exists that too is all that IS.

These are the only two ways. You can choose whichever kind of a journey you like. These two kinds appear very contradictory. They are contradictory as far as types are concerned, but as far as achievement is concerned there is no contradiction. One arrives through shunya, the void, as much as one arrives through the Whole. Some arrives by saying: neither this, nor that. Others arrive by seeing god in all -- they think and feel by realizing god in everything. The basic idea is one wants to reach at a point where duality exists no more.

Duality can dissolve into nothingness in two ways; it can become non-existent if either one accepts everything, or one denies everything. It can happen if either all bondages are dropped, or all bondages are identified with the atman, the spirit. Either there is no bondage any more; or, the bondage itself becomes everything, the atman -- it becomes the universal, then too it ceases to be bondage.

Neither the yogi needs to go into Sankhya, nor does the seeker of Sankhya need to go into Yoga. And yet, the point where both reach is the same. One does not have to make any changes. Both bring you to the same place.

Each individual has to look within to see what one’s interests are, what is his or her true identity, whether one’s leaning is toward the positive or the negative; toward the Whole or the Nothingness. It can also be seen this way: if a person is of emotional type, if he is filled with emotions, the language of Wholeness will be acceptable to him. And if the person is of a very intellectual type, the language and expression of denial, of the Negetive will be acceptable to him. Logic negates, it follows the process of elimination. It goes on saying: this is meaningless, that is meaningless, that too is meaningless -- it keeps discarding until nothing is left to throw away. When nothing is left to throw out, the logic too drops on its own accord.

Have you seen the wick of a lamp? It makes the oil burn. Once it burns the oil completely, then it burns itself too. Have you observed, the wick being consumed by the flame and then when the whole wick is burned out the flame also blows off? Reasoning goes on denying -- not this, nor this, not this. At the end when nothing is left to deny, the reasoning that kept on denying also exists no more. Trust goes on accepting -- this, and this, and this too, and when all is accepted and  trust is needed no more, it drops too.

When both reasoning and trust disappear one arrives at the same destination; at the same temple.

To Continue...

From Lemurs to Lamas

Confessions of a Bodhisattva
Prem Purushottama Goodnight

This book is dedicated to this oceanic presence which we call Osho.


Through the process of putting this material down in words I have realized that there is a difference between re-membering a story and allowing the space of the story to retell itself.

This is not a commercial exercise. When I came to that conclusion it was tremendously liberating. You are free to copy and distribute this work for any non-commercial purpose. I have listed the sources from which I have borrowed words. I wish to express my eternal gratitude to beloved Amido for her invaluable assistance, suggestions and support as well as for providing some of the photographs. And in the end, life is a story, a fictional, non-fiction of which I am the Witness.

If for any reason you wish to contact me, you may do so by email: pgoodnight@yahoo.com
Love Is Being,


Kopan and Kathmandu

It was the most amazing New Year ever, crossing into Nepal, after having left the Indian immigration checkpoint, in a bullock cart at sunrise. The sky was ablaze, the haze and dust in the air heightened the reds and oranges of the sun. This was New Years Day 1976, it was sure to be a super year, and as it turned out it was.

During that last term in Madagascar I heard from my friend Peter. He was now in Nepal studying Tibetan Buddhism with Lama Yeshe at the Kopan Monastery in Kathmandu. Randy Dodge who was still living at the house was attracted to going to India and Nepal. He had been practicing yoga for several years and was also interested in Buddhism. I was interested in Nepal but somehow fearful of India. I knew deep down that it could grab me and not let me go. By this time Voahangy had gone to Brussels to join her U.N. boyfriend. Rickey was making arrangements to go to university in France. Randy and I were busy changing Malagasy francs into U.S. dollars with the Indian money changers and making preparations for our trip to the sub-continent.

Randy had discovered that there was an Indian passenger line that traveled from Mauritius to Bombay and so we made plans to go to Mauritius and leave from there. I said goodbye to my home for two years and a place that will forever have a special place in my heart.

Thirty-three years after first arriving in Madagascar, I finally made a trip back with Amido in 2006. She loved the place as much as I do. Many things looked the same, although Tana was a bit of a shock. In 1975 the population of Madagascar was around eight million, in 2006 it was sixteen million and most of those are now in Tana. I have never seen so many kids.

The ship we took had several classes of travel. I think Randy and I took the next to last. It was not too bad really, dormitory style with bunk beds. The food was good. There was both a vegetarian line and a non-vegetarian line. We used the vegetarian line for lunch and dinner and  the non-veg for breakfast because we wanted eggs. The trip took several days and on the way we were treated to Indian movies. That was the first time I had ever seen a Bollywood production. Treated is probably not very accurate because the sound system was terrible and it was painfully loud. The days were spent on the deck watching the sea go by and reading Herman Hess’s The Glass Bead Game. So after another trip across the Indian Ocean we arrived in Bombay, India.

In Bombay we stayed at the Salvation Army Hostel. On the streets were quite a few wasted westerners wandering around. We didn’t really expect that to be our fate but it was a good heads up. We were both interested in getting up to Nepal as soon as possible and decided to take a train out to a good place to begin hitchhiking from. We didn’t see any reason why we couldn’t hitch in India. On our very first ride we had a surprise. A truck stopped. It was open in the back and we just needed to climb up and jump in. We threw our backpacks over the rail and climbed up and landed in a truck bed of manure. It wasn’t very wet so we just shrugged our shoulders and we were on our way.

After a couple of days traveling we were ready to enter Nepal. We had arrived in the border town too late to be able to cross that day. We would have to wait for tomorrow. It just happened to be New Year’s Eve. I don’t think we made any festivities but just awaited our trip into Nepal in the morning. Tomorrow was the beginning of 1976 and it looked like it would be an interesting year.

                                                 Kathmandu, Nepal

After arriving in Kathmandu we found our way to freak street where I knew Peter was staying in a guest house. Randy and Peter had never met. Peter had already left Madagascar by the time Randy showed up. Peter was very much into his exploration into Tibetan Buddhism. He was involved in a course that was being offered at the Kopan monastery on the outskirts of the city. One day we went with him to visit and had a short little chat with Lama Yeshe over a cup of tea. I don’t remember the circumstances well but for some reason, Lama Yeshe offered me his cup of tea which I shared. He was a very kind man with a boyish grin. There were many westerners involved in the meditation teachings at the time but for some reason I wasn’t drawn to joining.

Randy and I went on to Pokhara in order to do a trek. In those days, Pokhara hadn’t really become a big scene, like it is today. There was the town of Pokhara. On the sides of Lake Phewa, there were a few guesthouses. Nearby Pokhara there was a Tibetan refugee camp and so a few Tibetans would set up on the paths and sell Tibetan goods. I bought a Tibetan mala and some pieces of coral with holes drilled for putting them on a mala. The guest house was very simple but I remember a nice garden and of course the views were incredible of both the lake and the mountains, a truly idyllic scene. There was a Japanese couple staying in the guest house that I noticed. She was very sweet and soft and he was very intense, he looked like a samurai. I would meet this couple again and they would get new names and become Geeta and Asanga.

To Continue...

Osho World Online Magazine :: October 2010 - Osho_Responsibility
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001